Transcript for Fishermen take fight to reel in government regulation to Supreme Court
>> MY FAVORITE.
NOW.
NOW.
>> WELCOME BACK, EVERYONE.
>> WELCOME BACK, EVERYONE.
FOR NEARLY 50 YEARS, AMERICA'S
FOR NEARLY 50 YEARS, AMERICA'S
HERRING FISHERMEN HAVE BEEN
HERRING FISHERMEN HAVE BEEN
REQUIRED TO TAKE FEDERAL
REQUIRED TO TAKE FEDERAL
INSPECTORS ON THEIR BOATS WHEN
INSPECTORS ON THEIR BOATS WHEN
THEY GO OUT TO SEA.
THEY GO OUT TO SEA.
BUT RECENTLY, THE GOVERNMENT
BUT RECENTLY, THE GOVERNMENT
WENT A STEP FURTHER, ASKING
WENT A STEP FURTHER, ASKING
THEM TO PAY THEIR SALARIES
THEM TO PAY THEIR SALARIES
AS WELL.
AS WELL.
THE MOVE HAS PROMPTED A MAJOR
THE MOVE HAS PROMPTED A MAJOR
LEGAL BATTLE.
LEGAL BATTLE.
AND AT THE SUPREME COURT THIS
AND AT THE SUPREME COURT THIS
FALL, THE FISHERMEN WILL ASK
FALL, THE FISHERMEN WILL ASK
THE JUSTICES TO REEL
THE JUSTICES TO REEL
IN GOVERNMENT POWER A BIG WAY.
IN GOVERNMENT POWER A BIG WAY.
IN TONIGHT'S PRIME FOCUS,
IN TONIGHT'S PRIME FOCUS,
OUR DEVIN DWYER TAKES A LOOK.
OUR DEVIN DWYER TAKES A LOOK.
>> THE STAKES, WHICH COULD
>> THE STAKES, WHICH COULD
STRETCH FAR BEYOND THE OCEAN.
STRETCH FAR BEYOND THE OCEAN.
THIS IS THE RADAR THAT HELPS
THIS IS THE RADAR THAT HELPS
TO FIND THE FISH MORE OR LESS.
TO FIND THE FISH MORE OR LESS.
IT LOOKS STRAIGHT UNDER
IT LOOKS STRAIGHT UNDER
THE BOAT AND IT SEES WHATEVER'S
THE BOAT AND IT SEES WHATEVER'S
UNDER THE BOAT.
UNDER THE BOAT.
>> IN CAPE MAY, NEW JERSEY,
>> IN CAPE MAY, NEW JERSEY,
THE HUNT FOR NORTH
THE HUNT FOR NORTH
ATLANTIC HERRING, A FAMILY
ATLANTIC HERRING, A FAMILY
AFFAIR.
AFFAIR.
YOU'VE BEEN DOING THIS FOR
YOU'VE BEEN DOING THIS FOR
YEARS.
YEARS.
YOU LOVE IT?
YOU LOVE IT?
YEAH.
YEAH.
>> AND I DON'T KNOW HOW TO DO
>> AND I DON'T KNOW HOW TO DO
ANYTHING ELSE.
ANYTHING ELSE.
>> STEVEN AXELSSON,
>> STEVEN AXELSSON,
HIS GRANDFATHER, EMIGRATED HERE
HIS GRANDFATHER, EMIGRATED HERE
FROM SWEDEN IN 1954.
FROM SWEDEN IN 1954.
HELPING HIS SEASIDE COMMUNITY
HELPING HIS SEASIDE COMMUNITY
BLOSSOM INTO A BASE FOR FAMILY
BLOSSOM INTO A BASE FOR FAMILY
FISHING BUSINESSES.
FISHING BUSINESSES.
THE WATERS OFF THE COAST
THE WATERS OFF THE COAST
ARE HOME TO SCORES OF LONG,
ARE HOME TO SCORES OF LONG,
THIN SQUID AND ATLANTIC
THIN SQUID AND ATLANTIC
HERRING, A FISH USED FOR FOOD
HERRING, A FISH USED FOR FOOD
AND AS BAIT FOR LOBSTERS.
AND AS BAIT FOR LOBSTERS.
>> THIS WILL BE A SIMILAR TODAY
>> THIS WILL BE A SIMILAR TODAY
TO WHAT WE'RE WORKING IN THIS
TO WHAT WE'RE WORKING IN THIS
BILL BRIGHT HAS BEEN
BILL BRIGHT HAS BEEN
THE HERRING BUSINESS HERE FOR
THE HERRING BUSINESS HERE FOR
40 YEARS.
40 YEARS.
>> TO ACTUALLY BE A GOOD
>> TO ACTUALLY BE A GOOD
FISHERMAN, YOU HAVE TO BE
FISHERMAN, YOU HAVE TO BE
COMFORTABLE BEING,
COMFORTABLE BEING,
UNCOMFORTABLE.
UNCOMFORTABLE.
IF YOU NEED FINANCIAL SECURITY,
IF YOU NEED FINANCIAL SECURITY,
FISHING IS NOT FOR YOU.
FISHING IS NOT FOR YOU.
>> HOW MANY HERRING AND POUNDS
>> HOW MANY HERRING AND POUNDS
WILL YOU EACH CATCH THIS YEAR?
WILL YOU EACH CATCH THIS YEAR?
>> YOU THINK WAS MADE?
>> YOU THINK WAS MADE?
MAYBE £1,000,000, BUT ON A GOOD
MAYBE £1,000,000, BUT ON A GOOD
YEAR BEFORE WE WOULD CATCH £10
YEAR BEFORE WE WOULD CATCH £10
MILLION.
MILLION.
>> HIGHER INSURANCE RATES
>> HIGHER INSURANCE RATES
AND FUEL COSTS EATEN INTO
AND FUEL COSTS EATEN INTO
PROFIT MARGINS AND SHRINKING
PROFIT MARGINS AND SHRINKING
STOCKS OF FISH LIKELY CAUSED
STOCKS OF FISH LIKELY CAUSED
BY CLIMATE CHANGE MEAN
BY CLIMATE CHANGE MEAN
DRAMATICALLY LOWER GOVERNMENT
DRAMATICALLY LOWER GOVERNMENT
CAPS ON WHAT THEY CAN CATCH.
CAPS ON WHAT THEY CAN CATCH.
>> THE GOVERNMENT SAYS THAT THE
>> THE GOVERNMENT SAYS THAT THE
HERRING FISHERY OVERFISHED.
HERRING FISHERY OVERFISHED.
DO YOU AGREE WITH THAT?
DO YOU AGREE WITH THAT?
I WOULDN'T AGREE WITH THAT NOW.
I WOULDN'T AGREE WITH THAT NOW.
I MEAN, NOBODY HAS
I MEAN, NOBODY HAS
MORE INVESTED THAN ME AND,
MORE INVESTED THAN ME AND,
STEVE, AND NOBODY CARES
STEVE, AND NOBODY CARES
MORE ABOUT THIS FISHERY
MORE ABOUT THIS FISHERY
AND NOBODY CARES MORE ABOUT
AND NOBODY CARES MORE ABOUT
THE OCEAN.
THE OCEAN.
>> WE DO.
>> WE DO.
SINCE 1976, FEDERAL MARINE
SINCE 1976, FEDERAL MARINE
OBSERVERS, THESE HAVE BEEN PUT
OBSERVERS, THESE HAVE BEEN PUT
ON COMMERCIAL FISHING VESSELS
ON COMMERCIAL FISHING VESSELS
TO COLLECT DATA TO HELP SET
TO COLLECT DATA TO HELP SET
FISHING GUIDELINES.
FISHING GUIDELINES.
THEY'RE TAKING NOTES.
THEY'RE TAKING NOTES.
THEY'RE TAKING HITS ON
THEY'RE TAKING HITS ON
WHAT TYPE OF FISH
WHAT TYPE OF FISH
YOU'RE BRINGING IN WHILE
YOU'RE BRINGING IN WHILE
THEY'RE TAKING THEIR BACK
THEY'RE TAKING THEIR BACK
IN AND WHAT TIME YOU SET.
IN AND WHAT TIME YOU SET.
WHERE ARE YOU SET, WHERE
WHERE ARE YOU SET, WHERE
YOU HAUL.
YOU HAUL.
HOW MUCH TOE ARE YOU HAVE?
HOW MUCH TOE ARE YOU HAVE?
AND THEN THEY'RE ACTUALLY THEN
AND THEN THEY'RE ACTUALLY THEN
THEY ACTUALLY HOW MUCH YOU HAVE
THEY ACTUALLY HOW MUCH YOU HAVE
AND WHAT YOU HAVE FOR SOMETIMES
AND WHAT YOU HAVE FOR SOMETIMES
DAYS AT SEA.
DAYS AT SEA.
>> THEY'RE IN CLOSE QUARTERS
>> THEY'RE IN CLOSE QUARTERS
WITH THE FISHERMEN.
WITH THE FISHERMEN.
AND WHEN I FIND THAT FISH
AND WHEN I FIND THAT FISH
ARE ALMOST LIKE FIREMEN,
ARE ALMOST LIKE FIREMEN,
THEY HAVE TO RESPOND INSTANTLY.
THEY HAVE TO RESPOND INSTANTLY.
>> EVEN SHARING BUNK BEDS,
>> EVEN SHARING BUNK BEDS,
A TINY CABIN.
A TINY CABIN.
>> SO THEY'RE IN WITH YOUR
>> SO THEY'RE IN WITH YOUR
GUYS, RIGHT?
GUYS, RIGHT?
AND WITH THE GUYS THREE YEARS
AND WITH THE GUYS THREE YEARS
AGO, FEDERAL REGULATORS LOOKING
AGO, FEDERAL REGULATORS LOOKING
TO EXPAND COVERAGE OF OBSERVERS
TO EXPAND COVERAGE OF OBSERVERS
AT SEA MOVED TO REQUIRE
AT SEA MOVED TO REQUIRE
SOME HERRING.
SOME HERRING.
FISHERMEN TO DIRECTLY PAY
FISHERMEN TO DIRECTLY PAY
OBSERVER SALARIES.
OBSERVER SALARIES.
UP TO $700 A DAY.
UP TO $700 A DAY.
>> WE DON'T MIND TAKING
>> WE DON'T MIND TAKING
OBSERVERS, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE
OBSERVERS, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE
FOR DECADES NOW, BUT TO BE TOLD
FOR DECADES NOW, BUT TO BE TOLD
TO FOR IT JUST ISN'T RIGHT.
TO FOR IT JUST ISN'T RIGHT.
>> BY ONE ESTIMATE, THAT COULD
>> BY ONE ESTIMATE, THAT COULD
TOP 20% OF THE REVENUE OF A
TOP 20% OF THE REVENUE OF A
FISHERMAN'S CATCH, WHICH
FISHERMAN'S CATCH, WHICH
IS NEVER A GUARANTEE.
IS NEVER A GUARANTEE.
>> SO ON SOME TRIPS,
>> SO ON SOME TRIPS,
THE OBSERVER COULD BE THE
THE OBSERVER COULD BE THE
HIGHEST PAID.
HIGHEST PAID.
WITHOUT WITHOUT A DOUBT.
WITHOUT WITHOUT A DOUBT.
SO AT SOME POINT, I MAY NOT
SO AT SOME POINT, I MAY NOT
MAKE A HERRING TRIP IF I GOT
MAKE A HERRING TRIP IF I GOT
TO, YOU KNOW, TAKE A MONITOR
TO, YOU KNOW, TAKE A MONITOR
AND PAY FOR IT BECAUSE IT MIGHT
AND PAY FOR IT BECAUSE IT MIGHT
NOT BE IT TO ME AND MY CREW.
NOT BE IT TO ME AND MY CREW.
>> BRIGHT AND AXELSSON SAY
>> BRIGHT AND AXELSSON SAY
THE RULE COULD DRIVE OUT
THE RULE COULD DRIVE OUT
OF BUSINESS.
OF BUSINESS.
CONGRESS NEVER MENTIONED
CONGRESS NEVER MENTIONED
EXPLICITLY IN THE LAW ANYTHING
EXPLICITLY IN THE LAW ANYTHING
ABOUT HAVING THEM PAY OBSERVER
ABOUT HAVING THEM PAY OBSERVER
SALARIES.
SALARIES.
YOU'RE WORRIED ABOUT THE
YOU'RE WORRIED ABOUT THE
GOVERNMENT FORCING
GOVERNMENT FORCING
MORE FISHERMEN TO PAY THEIR OWN
MORE FISHERMEN TO PAY THEIR OWN
INSPECTORS?
INSPECTORS?
ME AND AROUND ME IS CONCERNED
ME AND AROUND ME IS CONCERNED
ABOUT THAT.
ABOUT THAT.
HIGHLY CONCERNED ABOUT THAT
HIGHLY CONCERNED ABOUT THAT
BECAUSE THE MARGINS ARE SO
BECAUSE THE MARGINS ARE SO
TIGHT RIGHT NOW.
TIGHT RIGHT NOW.
THE FISHERMEN TURNED FOR HELP
THE FISHERMEN TURNED FOR HELP
TO ONE OF THE COUNTRY'S MOST
TO ONE OF THE COUNTRY'S MOST
EXPERIENCED SUPREME COURT
EXPERIENCED SUPREME COURT
LAWYERS, PAUL CLEMENT, WHO'S
LAWYERS, PAUL CLEMENT, WHO'S
ARGUED OVER 100 CASES THIS
ARGUED OVER 100 CASES THIS
FALL.
FALL.
HE'LL ASK THE JUSTICES TO DOWN
HE'LL ASK THE JUSTICES TO DOWN
THE POLICY.
THE POLICY.
>> SO IF CONGRESS THINKS THIS
>> SO IF CONGRESS THINKS THIS
REALLY IMPORTANT THAT THERE
REALLY IMPORTANT THAT THERE
BE A MONITOR ON EVERY SHIP,
BE A MONITOR ON EVERY SHIP,
WELL, THEN IT CAN PAY FOR
WELL, THEN IT CAN PAY FOR
A MONITOR ON EVERY SHIP.
A MONITOR ON EVERY SHIP.
CONGRESS DID.
CONGRESS DID.
REGULATORS AT THE NATIONAL
REGULATORS AT THE NATIONAL
MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
THE POWER TO SET RULES AS MAY
THE POWER TO SET RULES AS MAY
BE NECESSARY TO DO THEIR JOBS.
BE NECESSARY TO DO THEIR JOBS.
THE GOVERNMENT ARGUES IN COURT
THE GOVERNMENT ARGUES IN COURT
DOCUMENTS THAT BROAD LANGUAGE
DOCUMENTS THAT BROAD LANGUAGE
IMPLICITLY ALLOWS THE AGENCY
IMPLICITLY ALLOWS THE AGENCY
TO HAVE FISHERMEN PAY
TO HAVE FISHERMEN PAY
THEIR OBSERVERS.
THEIR OBSERVERS.
WE WANT CONGRESS TRYING
WE WANT CONGRESS TRYING
TO FIGURE OUT THE NITTY GRITTY
TO FIGURE OUT THE NITTY GRITTY
DETAILS OF LITERALLY
DETAILS OF LITERALLY
EVERYTHING.
EVERYTHING.
>> MEREDITH MOORE IS WITH
>> MEREDITH MOORE IS WITH
THE OCEAN CONSERVANCY AND SITS
THE OCEAN CONSERVANCY AND SITS
ON THE NATION'S MARINE
ON THE NATION'S MARINE
FISHERIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
FISHERIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
>> CONGRESS HAS DELEGATED THESE
>> CONGRESS HAS DELEGATED THESE
SORTS OF AUTHORITIES TO THE
SORTS OF AUTHORITIES TO THE
FEDERAL AGENCIES TO BE EXPERTS
FEDERAL AGENCIES TO BE EXPERTS
AND MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE
AND MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE
PROTECTING HUMAN HEALTH
PROTECTING HUMAN HEALTH
AND SAFETY AND THE ENVIRONMENT.
AND SAFETY AND THE ENVIRONMENT.
IS IT FAIR FOR FISHERMEN,
IS IT FAIR FOR FISHERMEN,
IN YOUR VIEW, HAVE TO PAY
IN YOUR VIEW, HAVE TO PAY
THE SALARIES OF THESE
THE SALARIES OF THESE
OBSERVERS?
OBSERVERS?
I THINK IT'S IN LINE WITH THE
I THINK IT'S IN LINE WITH THE
AUTHORITIES THAT THE GOVERNMENT
AUTHORITIES THAT THE GOVERNMENT
HAS TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO SHARE
HAS TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO SHARE
THOSE BURDENS.
THOSE BURDENS.
IF THE FISHERMEN WIN, IT COULD
IF THE FISHERMEN WIN, IT COULD
HAVE A MAJOR IMPACT FAR BEYOND
HAVE A MAJOR IMPACT FAR BEYOND
THE OCEAN.
THE OCEAN.
>> THIS IS REALLY ABOUT THE
>> THIS IS REALLY ABOUT THE
GOVERNMENT WITHOUT EXPRESS
GOVERNMENT WITHOUT EXPRESS
AUTHORIZATION FROM CONGRESS,
AUTHORIZATION FROM CONGRESS,
IMPOSING SOME ADDITIONAL HUGE
IMPOSING SOME ADDITIONAL HUGE
COSTS ON THE INDUSTRY.
COSTS ON THE INDUSTRY.
CLEMENT SAYS THE GOVERNMENT'S
CLEMENT SAYS THE GOVERNMENT'S
ENTIRE SYSTEM OF REGULATIONS
ENTIRE SYSTEM OF REGULATIONS
FROM HEALTH TO ENVIRONMENTAL
FROM HEALTH TO ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION, EVEN TAX COLLECTION
PROTECTION, EVEN TAX COLLECTION
,GIVES FEDERAL AGENCIES TOO
,GIVES FEDERAL AGENCIES TOO
MUCH POWER, NOT DIRECTLY
MUCH POWER, NOT DIRECTLY
BY CONGRESS.
BY CONGRESS.
>> SO THIS IS ABOUT GRAY AREAS.
>> SO THIS IS ABOUT GRAY AREAS.
THIS IS ABOUT GRAY AREAS.
THIS IS ABOUT GRAY AREAS.
BUT THE PROBLEM IS, ONCE
BUT THE PROBLEM IS, ONCE
YOU SAY THAT THERE ARE GRAY
YOU SAY THAT THERE ARE GRAY
AREAS AND THEN THERE'S
AREAS AND THEN THERE'S
A DIFFERENT RULE, PEOPLE START
A DIFFERENT RULE, PEOPLE START
SEEING GRAY EVERYWHERE.
SEEING GRAY EVERYWHERE.
FOR NEARLY 40 YEARS,
FOR NEARLY 40 YEARS,
THE SUPREME COURT HAS SAID IN
THE SUPREME COURT HAS SAID IN
DISPUTES OVER FEDERAL
DISPUTES OVER FEDERAL
REGULATIONS THAT JUDGES SHOULD
REGULATIONS THAT JUDGES SHOULD
DEFER TO POLICY EXPERTS WHEN
DEFER TO POLICY EXPERTS WHEN
THE LAW IS UNCLEAR.
THE LAW IS UNCLEAR.
THE PRACTICE HAS BECOME KNOWN
THE PRACTICE HAS BECOME KNOWN
AS THE CHEVRON DOCTRINE NAMED
AS THE CHEVRON DOCTRINE NAMED
AFTER THE 1984 CASE.
AFTER THE 1984 CASE.
SEVERAL OF THE COURTS WANT IT
SEVERAL OF THE COURTS WANT IT
OVERTURNED.
OVERTURNED.
>> I DO THINK THAT IF YOU RID
>> I DO THINK THAT IF YOU RID
OF CHEVRON, YOU WOULD
OF CHEVRON, YOU WOULD
ESSENTIALLY FORCE YOU'D MAKE
ESSENTIALLY FORCE YOU'D MAKE
THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH
THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH
A LITTLE LESS POWERFUL.
A LITTLE LESS POWERFUL.
>> YOU'D MAKE THE OTHER
>> YOU'D MAKE THE OTHER
TWO BRANCHES A LITTLE MORE
TWO BRANCHES A LITTLE MORE
POWERFUL.
POWERFUL.
>> SO WHAT WE LOSE WITH THIS
>> SO WHAT WE LOSE WITH THIS
CASE IS THE GROUNDING OF OUR
CASE IS THE GROUNDING OF OUR
GOVERNMENT IN EXPERTISE
GOVERNMENT IN EXPERTISE
AND SCIENCE IN THE WAY THAT WE
AND SCIENCE IN THE WAY THAT WE
INTERPRET LAWS ALL OVER
INTERPRET LAWS ALL OVER
THE COUNTRY.
THE COUNTRY.
>> NOW WE'RE TAKING THE FISH
>> NOW WE'RE TAKING THE FISH
OUT OF THE SEA AS BILL BRIGHT
OUT OF THE SEA AS BILL BRIGHT
PREPARES FOR HERRING SEASON
PREPARES FOR HERRING SEASON
IN NOVEMBER.
IN NOVEMBER.
AND STEPHEN AXELSSON OUT
AND STEPHEN AXELSSON OUT
THE BIGGEST CATCH.
THE BIGGEST CATCH.
>> SOMETIMES THEY MOVE AND YOU
>> SOMETIMES THEY MOVE AND YOU
GOT TO GO FIND THEM AGAIN.
GOT TO GO FIND THEM AGAIN.
BOTH MEN SAY THEIR MINDS
BOTH MEN SAY THEIR MINDS
WILL BE ON THE SUPREME COURT.
WILL BE ON THE SUPREME COURT.
JUST EXPECT TO SEE THEM THERE.
JUST EXPECT TO SEE THEM THERE.
ARE YOU BOTH GOING TO BE
ARE YOU BOTH GOING TO BE
IN WASHINGTON WHEN THIS WHEN
IN WASHINGTON WHEN THIS WHEN
THIS THING IS HEARD, DO
THIS THING IS HEARD, DO
YOU THINK ARE YOU GOING TO TAKE
YOU THINK ARE YOU GOING TO TAKE
IT IN FULL?
IT IN FULL?
PROBABLY BEFORE PROBABLY
This transcript has been automatically generated and may not be 100% accurate.